<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1379 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291761</link>
    <description>Settled inter se seniority, once conclusively fixed by binding judicial orders and reflected in consequential promotions, cannot be reopened or diluted except in strict conformity with those orders and the governing service rules. The Madras HC noted that the earlier Division Bench ruling, affirmed by the Supreme Court, had finally determined seniority with reference to permanent cadre strength and the applicable rules, so the agreed seniority list could not be re-agitated. It further required the department to protect the settled seniority position, consider employees in the promotional zone, and proceed with fresh provisional and final seniority lists and consequential promotion orders in accordance with the earlier directions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2024 12:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=628389" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1379 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291761</link>
      <description>Settled inter se seniority, once conclusively fixed by binding judicial orders and reflected in consequential promotions, cannot be reopened or diluted except in strict conformity with those orders and the governing service rules. The Madras HC noted that the earlier Division Bench ruling, affirmed by the Supreme Court, had finally determined seniority with reference to permanent cadre strength and the applicable rules, so the agreed seniority list could not be re-agitated. It further required the department to protect the settled seniority position, consider employees in the promotional zone, and proceed with fresh provisional and final seniority lists and consequential promotion orders in accordance with the earlier directions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291761</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>