<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 1544 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291722</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal against the CIT(A) order for assessment year 2007-08. The disallowance of bad debt and capital gains under section 50C were deleted by the CIT(A), citing specific legal precedents. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A) decision based on the legal positions established by the Bombay High Court and a tribunal case, determining that the revenue&#039;s objections were not valid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2021 16:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=628379" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 1544 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291722</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal against the CIT(A) order for assessment year 2007-08. The disallowance of bad debt and capital gains under section 50C were deleted by the CIT(A), citing specific legal precedents. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A) decision based on the legal positions established by the Bombay High Court and a tribunal case, determining that the revenue&#039;s objections were not valid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291722</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>