<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1921 (4) TMI 4 - Patna High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291721</link>
    <description>Section 3 of the Chota Nagpur Encumbered Estates Act was treated as a temporary statutory bar that suspended pending proceedings and rendered them void, while Section 12 was treated as removing that impediment on restoration of possession and reviving the suspended remedy. The suit could therefore be continued after the proprietor was restored, but only if the mortgage debt still remained unpaid. If the debt had already been satisfied by other mortgagors, no further proceeding could be maintained. The matter required inquiry by the trial court on whether the claim had been discharged before any revived suit could proceed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 1921 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2020 17:32:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=628378" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1921 (4) TMI 4 - Patna High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291721</link>
      <description>Section 3 of the Chota Nagpur Encumbered Estates Act was treated as a temporary statutory bar that suspended pending proceedings and rendered them void, while Section 12 was treated as removing that impediment on restoration of possession and reviving the suspended remedy. The suit could therefore be continued after the proprietor was restored, but only if the mortgage debt still remained unpaid. If the debt had already been satisfied by other mortgagors, no further proceeding could be maintained. The matter required inquiry by the trial court on whether the claim had been discharged before any revived suit could proceed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 1921 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291721</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>