<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (9) TMI 72 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23838</link>
    <description>Section 10(14) exempts only special allowances or benefits specifically granted to meet expenses wholly, necessarily and exclusively incurred in the performance of duties, or allowances notified by the Central Government for personal expenses at the place of duty or for increased cost of living. In the absence of any notification covering the allowances in question, the assessee failed to establish entitlement to exemption, and the relief claim was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 16:40:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=62836" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (9) TMI 72 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23838</link>
      <description>Section 10(14) exempts only special allowances or benefits specifically granted to meet expenses wholly, necessarily and exclusively incurred in the performance of duties, or allowances notified by the Central Government for personal expenses at the place of duty or for increased cost of living. In the absence of any notification covering the allowances in question, the assessee failed to establish entitlement to exemption, and the relief claim was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23838</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>