https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400956 The Court declined to set aside the cancellation order of the petitioner's registration due to the delayed challenge and failure to exhaust available statutory remedies under the GST Act. Emphasizing the importance of following statutory procedures and exploring remedies provided by law, the Court advised the petitioner to utilize Section 30 for revocation of cancellation without immediate full claim deposit. The Court stressed the significance of compliance with statutory provisions in matters concerning public revenue and underscored the need for due process and exhaustiveness in pursuing legal remedies. en-us Wed, 16 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 21 Mar 2025 13:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400956 The Court declined to set aside the cancellation order of the petitioner's registration due to the delayed challenge and failure to exhaust available statutory remedies under the GST Act. Emphasizing the importance of following statutory procedures and exploring remedies provided by law, the Court advised the petitioner to utilize Section 30 for revocation of cancellation without immediate full claim deposit. The Court stressed the significance of compliance with statutory provisions in matters concerning public revenue and underscored the need for due process and exhaustiveness in pursuing legal remedies. Case-Laws GST Wed, 16 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400956