https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291715 Under the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, a special eviction forum cannot order ejectment of an alleged trespasser if that relief lies only in an ordinary civil suit, and it cannot eject a sub-tenant independently unless the tenant-in-chief is also lawfully evicted. Section 14 was construed to protect a lawful sub-tenant only after the tenant's interest has fully determined, not merely on service or expiry of a notice terminating the contractual tenancy. Because the tenants-in-chief had not been evicted or otherwise lost possession rights, the appellant could not be treated as the landlord's tenant under Section 14, and the decree of ejectment was set aside. en-us Fri, 31 Mar 1967 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 Nov 2020 14:50:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291715 Under the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, a special eviction forum cannot order ejectment of an alleged trespasser if that relief lies only in an ordinary civil suit, and it cannot eject a sub-tenant independently unless the tenant-in-chief is also lawfully evicted. Section 14 was construed to protect a lawful sub-tenant only after the tenant's interest has fully determined, not merely on service or expiry of a notice terminating the contractual tenancy. Because the tenants-in-chief had not been evicted or otherwise lost possession rights, the appellant could not be treated as the landlord's tenant under Section 14, and the decree of ejectment was set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 31 Mar 1967 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291715