<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 695 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400940</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The non-compete fee was disallowed as capital expenditure, 1/5th of service charges disallowed subject to providing details, excise duty exemption grounds were not pressed, and share premium amount was not included in book profit for MAT purposes. The Tribunal upheld the decisions of the lower authorities on these issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2020 14:24:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=628331" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 695 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400940</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The non-compete fee was disallowed as capital expenditure, 1/5th of service charges disallowed subject to providing details, excise duty exemption grounds were not pressed, and share premium amount was not included in book profit for MAT purposes. The Tribunal upheld the decisions of the lower authorities on these issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400940</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>