<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 692 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400937</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on all issues, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal in its entirety. The disallowance of interest paid, remuneration to the Director, advertising and publicity expenses, rent expenses, various business expenses, and cost of goods sold were all resolved in favor of the assessee, with the Tribunal citing lack of evidence, unwarranted disallowances, and adherence to settled law in rejecting the revenue&#039;s contentions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2020 14:21:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=628327" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 692 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400937</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on all issues, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal in its entirety. The disallowance of interest paid, remuneration to the Director, advertising and publicity expenses, rent expenses, various business expenses, and cost of goods sold were all resolved in favor of the assessee, with the Tribunal citing lack of evidence, unwarranted disallowances, and adherence to settled law in rejecting the revenue&#039;s contentions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400937</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>