https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400929 A seniority exercise governed by prior binding orders may proceed where the State remains bound by settled principles, and the revision is confined to permanent posts; reopening the concluded controversy on temporary posts is impermissible. A writ challenge to a proposed provisional seniority list is premature when brought before publication of any final list, and such speculative interference cannot block the administration from completing the exercise within the earlier directions. The higher court therefore restored the State's ability to prepare and publish provisional seniority lists in accordance with the binding framework, while setting aside the interfering directions. en-us Thu, 05 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 Nov 2020 12:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400929 A seniority exercise governed by prior binding orders may proceed where the State remains bound by settled principles, and the revision is confined to permanent posts; reopening the concluded controversy on temporary posts is impermissible. A writ challenge to a proposed provisional seniority list is premature when brought before publication of any final list, and such speculative interference cannot block the administration from completing the exercise within the earlier directions. The higher court therefore restored the State's ability to prepare and publish provisional seniority lists in accordance with the binding framework, while setting aside the interfering directions. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 05 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400929