<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 680 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , NEW DELHI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400925</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, and the company&#039;s name was restored in the Register of Companies, as if it had not been struck off initially, in accordance with Section 248(1) of the Companies Act, 2013. The order was served to the concerned parties for compliance and information.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2020 13:06:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=628310" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 680 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , NEW DELHI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400925</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, and the company&#039;s name was restored in the Register of Companies, as if it had not been struck off initially, in accordance with Section 248(1) of the Companies Act, 2013. The order was served to the concerned parties for compliance and information.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400925</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>