<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (11) TMI 249 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291710</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court remitted the case back to the High Court for proper adjudication after finding that the dismissal of the Writ Petition without full consideration of merits was a result of an interim order. The appellants were directed not to work until the final resolution by the High Court. Each party was to bear their own costs, and the High Court was tasked with reconsidering the matter for a fair determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2023 17:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=628307" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (11) TMI 249 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291710</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court remitted the case back to the High Court for proper adjudication after finding that the dismissal of the Writ Petition without full consideration of merits was a result of an interim order. The appellants were directed not to work until the final resolution by the High Court. Each party was to bear their own costs, and the High Court was tasked with reconsidering the matter for a fair determination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291710</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>