<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (2) TMI 28 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23832</link>
    <description>The appeals filed by Narinder Kumar and others seeking specific performance and declaration of ownership were dismissed due to the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988, which barred their claims. On the other hand, the appeal filed by M. D. Jain seeking possession of the disputed property was allowed. The court ruled in favor of M. D. Jain, granting him possession of the land.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Dec 2019 17:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=62830" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (2) TMI 28 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23832</link>
      <description>The appeals filed by Narinder Kumar and others seeking specific performance and declaration of ownership were dismissed due to the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988, which barred their claims. On the other hand, the appeal filed by M. D. Jain seeking possession of the disputed property was allowed. The court ruled in favor of M. D. Jain, granting him possession of the land.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Benami Property</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23832</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>