<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 665 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400910</link>
    <description>The HC addressed the rejection of a claim under the Sabka Vishwas Scheme, 2019, due to an inadvertent error in the SVLDRS-1 form. It ruled that such a mistake, which did not confer undue advantage, was curable. The court directed the petitioner to apply for correction, allowing the respondent authorities to issue a reasoned order within two months. The writ petition was disposed of by enabling rectification, ensuring the petitioner could access the scheme&#039;s benefits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2024 14:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=628288" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 665 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400910</link>
      <description>The HC addressed the rejection of a claim under the Sabka Vishwas Scheme, 2019, due to an inadvertent error in the SVLDRS-1 form. It ruled that such a mistake, which did not confer undue advantage, was curable. The court directed the petitioner to apply for correction, allowing the respondent authorities to issue a reasoned order within two months. The writ petition was disposed of by enabling rectification, ensuring the petitioner could access the scheme&#039;s benefits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400910</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>