<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 660 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400905</link>
    <description>Mismatch assessments must be conducted transparently, with the material relied on by the Department furnished to the assessee before finalisation so a meaningful response can be given. The absence of a centralised sharing mechanism does not prevent the assessing authority from independently collecting third-party details, collating the relevant data and supplying it to the assessee for reply before completing assessment. On the facts noted, the third-party dealer details were already available with the assessing authority, so the proceedings were not treated as awaiting any central mechanism; the notices were nevertheless held premature and the writ petitions were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2020 11:04:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=628282" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 660 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400905</link>
      <description>Mismatch assessments must be conducted transparently, with the material relied on by the Department furnished to the assessee before finalisation so a meaningful response can be given. The absence of a centralised sharing mechanism does not prevent the assessing authority from independently collecting third-party details, collating the relevant data and supplying it to the assessee for reply before completing assessment. On the facts noted, the third-party dealer details were already available with the assessing authority, so the proceedings were not treated as awaiting any central mechanism; the notices were nevertheless held premature and the writ petitions were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400905</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>