https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400904 A summoning order passed as a common order in distinct complaints involving different parties could not be sustained, because the trial court had not correlated the parties or the complaint records before proceeding against the accused. Where the complaint invoked both the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007 and the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, the court was required to first determine the applicable statutory framework before issuing summons. The impugned summoning order was set aside, and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration of summoning in accordance with law. en-us Wed, 18 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 Nov 2020 11:03:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400904 A summoning order passed as a common order in distinct complaints involving different parties could not be sustained, because the trial court had not correlated the parties or the complaint records before proceeding against the accused. Where the complaint invoked both the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007 and the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, the court was required to first determine the applicable statutory framework before issuing summons. The impugned summoning order was set aside, and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration of summoning in accordance with law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 18 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400904