<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1621 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291692</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, accepting the 15% variation in electricity consumption per metric ton of finished goods and directing the deletion of the Rs. 90,77,052 additions made by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal found no fault with the CIT(A)&#039;s acceptance of the assessee&#039;s books and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2024 12:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=628267" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1621 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291692</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, accepting the 15% variation in electricity consumption per metric ton of finished goods and directing the deletion of the Rs. 90,77,052 additions made by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal found no fault with the CIT(A)&#039;s acceptance of the assessee&#039;s books and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291692</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>