<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1378 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291704</link>
    <description>A writ petition challenging summons issued to a partner was dismissed because counsel conceded that the authority had power to issue the summons and the court found no sufficient legal basis to interfere with that administrative exercise of power. The court therefore declined to quash the summons. The request to exempt the partner from personal appearance was also rejected, as no satisfactory reason was shown to justify relief from attendance before the authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2025 11:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=628262" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1378 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291704</link>
      <description>A writ petition challenging summons issued to a partner was dismissed because counsel conceded that the authority had power to issue the summons and the court found no sufficient legal basis to interfere with that administrative exercise of power. The court therefore declined to quash the summons. The request to exempt the partner from personal appearance was also rejected, as no satisfactory reason was shown to justify relief from attendance before the authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291704</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>