<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 1111 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291686</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the inclusion of interest paid on delayed payments in the cost of acquisition. It upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that interest paid on installments forms part of the cost of acquisition, to be indexed separately. The Tribunal&#039;s ruling was based on the interpretation of relevant sections of the Income Tax Act, clarifying the treatment of cost of acquisition and improvement in capital gains computation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2020 11:51:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=628246" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 1111 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291686</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the inclusion of interest paid on delayed payments in the cost of acquisition. It upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that interest paid on installments forms part of the cost of acquisition, to be indexed separately. The Tribunal&#039;s ruling was based on the interpretation of relevant sections of the Income Tax Act, clarifying the treatment of cost of acquisition and improvement in capital gains computation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291686</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>