<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 651 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400896</link>
    <description>The appeal of the assessee was partly allowed by the Tribunal. The Tribunal directed the exclusion of certain comparables, reconsideration of others, and deletion of the adjustment on overdue receivables. The grounds related to jurisdictional error, non-satisfaction of conditions under Section 92C(3), and initiation of penalty proceedings were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2020 11:21:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=628233" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 651 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400896</link>
      <description>The appeal of the assessee was partly allowed by the Tribunal. The Tribunal directed the exclusion of certain comparables, reconsideration of others, and deletion of the adjustment on overdue receivables. The grounds related to jurisdictional error, non-satisfaction of conditions under Section 92C(3), and initiation of penalty proceedings were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400896</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>