<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 650 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400895</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the assessee, holding that the LTCG claimed was genuine and exempt under Section 10(38), the addition on account of notional commission under Section 69C was unsustainable, and the disallowance of interest expenses was unwarranted. The Tribunal emphasized the need for specific evidence and proper confrontation of evidence used against the assessee, rejecting the AO&#039;s reliance on generalized information and assumptions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2020 17:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=628231" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 650 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400895</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the assessee, holding that the LTCG claimed was genuine and exempt under Section 10(38), the addition on account of notional commission under Section 69C was unsustainable, and the disallowance of interest expenses was unwarranted. The Tribunal emphasized the need for specific evidence and proper confrontation of evidence used against the assessee, rejecting the AO&#039;s reliance on generalized information and assumptions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400895</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>