https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291683 An execution petition signed and verified by the decree-holders was accepted by the Court and acted upon through notices under Order XXI Rule 22 CPC and for attachment of property. The only defect was the omission to file the pleader's vakalatnama at presentation, which was later cured. On these facts, the defect did not render the petition invalid or non est for limitation purposes, so the execution petition was treated as duly filed and not barred by limitation. The objection based on the missing vakalatnama failed, and the appeal was allowed. en-us Fri, 22 Nov 1935 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 21 Nov 2020 11:02:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291683 An execution petition signed and verified by the decree-holders was accepted by the Court and acted upon through notices under Order XXI Rule 22 CPC and for attachment of property. The only defect was the omission to file the pleader's vakalatnama at presentation, which was later cured. On these facts, the defect did not render the petition invalid or non est for limitation purposes, so the execution petition was treated as duly filed and not barred by limitation. The objection based on the missing vakalatnama failed, and the appeal was allowed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 22 Nov 1935 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291683