<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 634 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400879</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Miscellaneous Application for early hearing as unnecessary since the appeal was already listed for hearing. The appellants initially filed an application not in the prescribed format but later complied with the correct filing procedure. The Tribunal granted an adjournment due to missing documents at the department&#039;s request, with both parties consenting to the adjournment. The matter was rescheduled for a hearing on 9 September 2020.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2020 10:31:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=628207" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 634 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400879</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Miscellaneous Application for early hearing as unnecessary since the appeal was already listed for hearing. The appellants initially filed an application not in the prescribed format but later complied with the correct filing procedure. The Tribunal granted an adjournment due to missing documents at the department&#039;s request, with both parties consenting to the adjournment. The matter was rescheduled for a hearing on 9 September 2020.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400879</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>