https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291681 A defect in the plaint signature or verification did not render the suit a nullity where the action had been instituted and prosecuted through counsel with the plaintiffs' authority, and no earlier objection was taken; the irregularity was treated as procedural and waivable, so the suit was not dismissed on that ground. On damages, the court upheld the contractual resale clause and accepted the measure based on the difference between the contract price and the resale proceeds after refusal to accept the goods; the lower courts' assessment was therefore sustained. The appeal failed and the decrees below were affirmed. en-us Mon, 03 Jul 1899 00:00:00 +0521 Sat, 21 Nov 2020 10:30:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291681 A defect in the plaint signature or verification did not render the suit a nullity where the action had been instituted and prosecuted through counsel with the plaintiffs' authority, and no earlier objection was taken; the irregularity was treated as procedural and waivable, so the suit was not dismissed on that ground. On damages, the court upheld the contractual resale clause and accepted the measure based on the difference between the contract price and the resale proceeds after refusal to accept the goods; the lower courts' assessment was therefore sustained. The appeal failed and the decrees below were affirmed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 03 Jul 1899 00:00:00 +0521 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291681