https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400875 Where a combined complaint was filed within the statutory period, the right to default bail under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 did not survive merely because the filing was not brought to the bail court's notice. The Supreme Court further held that bail granted on an erroneous or incomplete factual premise could be cancelled under Section 439(2), since such cancellation is distinct from cancellation for later misconduct. Applying these principles, the Court upheld cancellation of the default bail and left the accused to seek regular bail in accordance with law. en-us Fri, 20 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 Feb 2021 11:03:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400875 Where a combined complaint was filed within the statutory period, the right to default bail under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 did not survive merely because the filing was not brought to the bail court's notice. The Supreme Court further held that bail granted on an erroneous or incomplete factual premise could be cancelled under Section 439(2), since such cancellation is distinct from cancellation for later misconduct. Applying these principles, the Court upheld cancellation of the default bail and left the accused to seek regular bail in accordance with law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 20 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400875