https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400873 Denial of legal representation to detenues before the Advisory Board, while the detaining side was represented by counsel, was treated as unequal treatment in the detention review process and therefore unjustified. The failure to place the detenues' further representation before the Advisory Board, even on a stated ground of late receipt, deprived them of meaningful consideration of their case and breached the safeguards governing preventive detention. On these grounds, the continued detention was held unsustainable and the detention orders were quashed for non-compliance with constitutional and statutory protections. en-us Tue, 17 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 21 Nov 2020 10:10:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400873 Denial of legal representation to detenues before the Advisory Board, while the detaining side was represented by counsel, was treated as unequal treatment in the detention review process and therefore unjustified. The failure to place the detenues' further representation before the Advisory Board, even on a stated ground of late receipt, deprived them of meaningful consideration of their case and breached the safeguards governing preventive detention. On these grounds, the continued detention was held unsustainable and the detention orders were quashed for non-compliance with constitutional and statutory protections. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 17 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400873