https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400870 The appeal filed under Section 53 B of the Competition Act, 2002, was dismissed by the Tribunal, upholding the Competition Commission of India's (CCI) decision. The Appellant alleged abuse of dominant position under Section 4 of the Act against a Respondent for unfair pricing of rolling stock mounted GPR for ballast inspection. However, the Appellant failed to define the relevant market or establish the Respondent's dominance. The CCI noted the presence of multiple global competitors and found insufficient evidence of dominance or abuse. Consequently, the Tribunal found no grounds to challenge the CCI's order and dismissed the appeal. en-us Wed, 04 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 21 Nov 2020 10:10:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400870 The appeal filed under Section 53 B of the Competition Act, 2002, was dismissed by the Tribunal, upholding the Competition Commission of India's (CCI) decision. The Appellant alleged abuse of dominant position under Section 4 of the Act against a Respondent for unfair pricing of rolling stock mounted GPR for ballast inspection. However, the Appellant failed to define the relevant market or establish the Respondent's dominance. The CCI noted the presence of multiple global competitors and found insufficient evidence of dominance or abuse. Consequently, the Tribunal found no grounds to challenge the CCI's order and dismissed the appeal. Case-Laws Law of Competition Wed, 04 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400870