<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (8) TMI 54 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23821</link>
    <description>The court held that there was a change in the constitution of the firm, not a succession, for assessment purposes under sections 187(2) and 188 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Following the Supreme Court&#039;s precedent, a single assessment was deemed appropriate, with income before and after the change being clubbed together. The decision was made against the Revenue, and the parties were directed to bear their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 14:31:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=62819" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (8) TMI 54 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23821</link>
      <description>The court held that there was a change in the constitution of the firm, not a succession, for assessment purposes under sections 187(2) and 188 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Following the Supreme Court&#039;s precedent, a single assessment was deemed appropriate, with income before and after the change being clubbed together. The decision was made against the Revenue, and the parties were directed to bear their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23821</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>