<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 621 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400866</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside most demands confirmed by the Commissioner. The Appellant was found eligible for CENVAT credit on invoices not addressed to registered premises. The Tribunal disagreed with the denial of credit and ruled that the registration of premises is not mandatory for availing CENVAT credit. The only amount upheld was Rs. 7,038 for services received from abroad, which was acknowledged and not further contested.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 May 2021 10:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=628186" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 621 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400866</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside most demands confirmed by the Commissioner. The Appellant was found eligible for CENVAT credit on invoices not addressed to registered premises. The Tribunal disagreed with the denial of credit and ruled that the registration of premises is not mandatory for availing CENVAT credit. The only amount upheld was Rs. 7,038 for services received from abroad, which was acknowledged and not further contested.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400866</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>