<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1830 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291678</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the ITAT&#039;s deletion of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The HC determined that the issue was debatable, with the Assessee&#039;s claim for exemption under Section 54F being bona fide. The mere admission of an appeal does not justify penalty deletion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2024 12:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=628176" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1830 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291678</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the ITAT&#039;s deletion of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The HC determined that the issue was debatable, with the Assessee&#039;s claim for exemption under Section 54F being bona fide. The mere admission of an appeal does not justify penalty deletion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291678</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>