<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (7) TMI 49 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23818</link>
    <description>The High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the annual letting value of the ground floor occupied by the firm in which the assessee was a partner is not includible in the assessee&#039;s income under section 22 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court also held that the reopening of the assessment was not sustainable, as the conditions for exemption under section 22 were met. The judgment favored the assessee and was against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 14:16:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=62816" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (7) TMI 49 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23818</link>
      <description>The High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the annual letting value of the ground floor occupied by the firm in which the assessee was a partner is not includible in the assessee&#039;s income under section 22 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court also held that the reopening of the assessment was not sustainable, as the conditions for exemption under section 22 were met. The judgment favored the assessee and was against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23818</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>