<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 592 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400837</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by setting aside the revocation of the Customs Broker License and upholding the forfeiture of the security deposit. The decision emphasized adherence to the principles of natural justice, the necessity of proportional punishment, and the importance of due diligence by Customs Brokers in verifying client information.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2021 15:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=628116" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 592 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400837</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by setting aside the revocation of the Customs Broker License and upholding the forfeiture of the security deposit. The decision emphasized adherence to the principles of natural justice, the necessity of proportional punishment, and the importance of due diligence by Customs Brokers in verifying client information.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400837</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>