https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400829 The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the appeal filed by the revenue under the Finance Act, 1994. The petitioner's claim of being prejudiced by not being informed of the appeal and missing the opportunity to benefit from the Amnesty Scheme was rejected. The Court held that there is no statutory right for prior notification of revenue's appellate actions. The delay in receiving information did not prejudice the petitioner's eligibility for the Amnesty Scheme. The Court emphasized the importance of timely information in legal proceedings and the need to establish substantial prejudice for legal remedies. en-us Mon, 09 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Nov 2020 12:43:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400829 The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the appeal filed by the revenue under the Finance Act, 1994. The petitioner's claim of being prejudiced by not being informed of the appeal and missing the opportunity to benefit from the Amnesty Scheme was rejected. The Court held that there is no statutory right for prior notification of revenue's appellate actions. The delay in receiving information did not prejudice the petitioner's eligibility for the Amnesty Scheme. The Court emphasized the importance of timely information in legal proceedings and the need to establish substantial prejudice for legal remedies. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 09 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400829