<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 578 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400823</link>
    <description>A quasi-judicial assessment order must contain reasons, especially when objections to a proposed levy are rejected. A bare conclusion that an explanation is unsatisfactory does not amount to a speaking order and denies effective adjudication and natural justice. The order here gave no reasons for sustaining VAT on infra lease and mess charges, so it was set aside to that extent. Those issues were remitted for fresh consideration with a personal hearing and a reasoned order, and the petitioner succeeded only in part.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2020 12:25:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=628096" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 578 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400823</link>
      <description>A quasi-judicial assessment order must contain reasons, especially when objections to a proposed levy are rejected. A bare conclusion that an explanation is unsatisfactory does not amount to a speaking order and denies effective adjudication and natural justice. The order here gave no reasons for sustaining VAT on infra lease and mess charges, so it was set aside to that extent. Those issues were remitted for fresh consideration with a personal hearing and a reasoned order, and the petitioner succeeded only in part.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400823</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>