<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1372 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291655</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition, directing the 2nd respondent to pay the rebate of excise duty on the exported organic cotton yarn to the petitioner within 45 days, along with interest under Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The judgment emphasized the importance of honoring legitimate export incentives and rectifying the wrongful denial of such benefits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2020 12:08:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=628091" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1372 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291655</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition, directing the 2nd respondent to pay the rebate of excise duty on the exported organic cotton yarn to the petitioner within 45 days, along with interest under Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The judgment emphasized the importance of honoring legitimate export incentives and rectifying the wrongful denial of such benefits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291655</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>