<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (8) TMI 51 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23811</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition challenging the Company Law Board&#039;s approval of an employee&#039;s remuneration under section 40A(2), leading to the deletion of a disallowance of Rs. 1,20,014. The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the Board&#039;s approval indicated reasonable remuneration based on qualifications and experience, rendering section 40A(2) inapplicable. The Tribunal emphasized the Board&#039;s authority to set remuneration under the Companies Act, finding no grounds for challenge without evidence of misrepresentation or lack of disclosure. The court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s factual findings, concluding there was no legal issue to address.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:49:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=62809" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (8) TMI 51 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23811</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition challenging the Company Law Board&#039;s approval of an employee&#039;s remuneration under section 40A(2), leading to the deletion of a disallowance of Rs. 1,20,014. The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the Board&#039;s approval indicated reasonable remuneration based on qualifications and experience, rendering section 40A(2) inapplicable. The Tribunal emphasized the Board&#039;s authority to set remuneration under the Companies Act, finding no grounds for challenge without evidence of misrepresentation or lack of disclosure. The court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s factual findings, concluding there was no legal issue to address.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23811</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>