<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (8) TMI 50 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23810</link>
    <description>Borrowed money is not includible in &quot;capital employed&quot; for section 80J relief because the Supreme Court position treats borrowed capital as excluded from that computation. Accordingly, when value of assets is determined under rule 19A(2), rule 19A(3) requires borrowed funds to be left out of the assets base used for calculating capital employed. The reference was answered in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:47:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=62808" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (8) TMI 50 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23810</link>
      <description>Borrowed money is not includible in &quot;capital employed&quot; for section 80J relief because the Supreme Court position treats borrowed capital as excluded from that computation. Accordingly, when value of assets is determined under rule 19A(2), rule 19A(3) requires borrowed funds to be left out of the assets base used for calculating capital employed. The reference was answered in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23810</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>