<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1371 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291653</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Single Judge&#039;s decision on maintainability, emphasizing the need to exhaust alternate remedies under the Companies Act, 2013 before resorting to writ petitions. The Court urged the National Company Law Tribunal to expedite the pending application within two weeks. The writ appeal was dismissed without costs, emphasizing adherence to procedural requirements and utilizing the correct legal forum for resolving disputes efficiently.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2021 15:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=628075" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1371 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291653</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Single Judge&#039;s decision on maintainability, emphasizing the need to exhaust alternate remedies under the Companies Act, 2013 before resorting to writ petitions. The Court urged the National Company Law Tribunal to expedite the pending application within two weeks. The writ appeal was dismissed without costs, emphasizing adherence to procedural requirements and utilizing the correct legal forum for resolving disputes efficiently.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291653</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>