<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1824 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291632</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted sanction to the Scheme of Amalgamation under Sections 230 to 232 of the Companies Act, 2013, involving the Transferor Company, M/s. Agarwal Meadows Private Limited, and the Transferee Company, M/s. Paisalo Digital Limited. The approval was based on unanimous shareholder and creditor meetings, compliance with statutory requirements, and no pending proceedings against the Petitioner Companies. The judgment emphasized shareholder autonomy and limited court intervention, deeming the Scheme in stakeholders&#039; interest. The Petitioners were directed to fulfill statutory obligations, with the Transferor Company&#039;s dissolution without winding-up and assets transfer to the Transferee Company.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2020 12:07:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=628063" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1824 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291632</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted sanction to the Scheme of Amalgamation under Sections 230 to 232 of the Companies Act, 2013, involving the Transferor Company, M/s. Agarwal Meadows Private Limited, and the Transferee Company, M/s. Paisalo Digital Limited. The approval was based on unanimous shareholder and creditor meetings, compliance with statutory requirements, and no pending proceedings against the Petitioner Companies. The judgment emphasized shareholder autonomy and limited court intervention, deeming the Scheme in stakeholders&#039; interest. The Petitioners were directed to fulfill statutory obligations, with the Transferor Company&#039;s dissolution without winding-up and assets transfer to the Transferee Company.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291632</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>