<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (7) TMI 48 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23808</link>
    <description>The High Court of Calcutta ruled in a case involving jurisdiction under section 263 of the Income-tax Act that the notice issued by the Income-tax Officer was valid and did not infringe upon the petitioner&#039;s rights. The court determined that the subsequent assessment made by the Officer should be considered the &quot;regular assessment&quot; under section 214 of the Act. It found no merit in the writ petition, discharged the rule, and vacated all interim orders. The court emphasized compliance with court directions in assessment proceedings and allowed interest under section 214, concluding that the impugned notice was within jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:40:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=62806" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (7) TMI 48 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23808</link>
      <description>The High Court of Calcutta ruled in a case involving jurisdiction under section 263 of the Income-tax Act that the notice issued by the Income-tax Officer was valid and did not infringe upon the petitioner&#039;s rights. The court determined that the subsequent assessment made by the Officer should be considered the &quot;regular assessment&quot; under section 214 of the Act. It found no merit in the writ petition, discharged the rule, and vacated all interim orders. The court emphasized compliance with court directions in assessment proceedings and allowed interest under section 214, concluding that the impugned notice was within jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23808</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>