https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400818 The court rejected the petitioner's challenge to demand-cum-recovery notices under the GST Act, dismissing the writ petition but allowing appellate remedies against assessment orders. A subsequent review petition was initially dismissed but later allowed upon discovering errors in the communication of assessment orders. The court acknowledged and rectified its mistake, emphasizing the importance of ensuring litigants do not suffer due to court errors. en-us Thu, 12 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Mar 2025 17:57:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400818 The court rejected the petitioner's challenge to demand-cum-recovery notices under the GST Act, dismissing the writ petition but allowing appellate remedies against assessment orders. A subsequent review petition was initially dismissed but later allowed upon discovering errors in the communication of assessment orders. The court acknowledged and rectified its mistake, emphasizing the importance of ensuring litigants do not suffer due to court errors. Case-Laws GST Thu, 12 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400818