<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1926 (12) TMI 5 - HIGH COURT OF LAHORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291621</link>
    <description>Under Order XXII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, an appeal continues only if the deceased party&#039;s legal representatives are brought on record within limitation and the entire estate is properly represented. A belated, unsupported substitution application, without affidavit or proof of the death and substitution steps, was insufficient to keep the appeal alive against the deceased respondent, so the appeal abated as to her and the decree in her favour became final. The appeal also abated against the remaining respondent because one legal representative of the deceased appellant was not impleaded, leaving his estate incompletely represented. The appeal could not proceed and was dismissed with costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 1926 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2020 10:01:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=628040" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1926 (12) TMI 5 - HIGH COURT OF LAHORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291621</link>
      <description>Under Order XXII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, an appeal continues only if the deceased party&#039;s legal representatives are brought on record within limitation and the entire estate is properly represented. A belated, unsupported substitution application, without affidavit or proof of the death and substitution steps, was insufficient to keep the appeal alive against the deceased respondent, so the appeal abated as to her and the decree in her favour became final. The appeal also abated against the remaining respondent because one legal representative of the deceased appellant was not impleaded, leaving his estate incompletely represented. The appeal could not proceed and was dismissed with costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 1926 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291621</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>