https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291619 The court held that the decree in C.S. No. 81 of 1921 and the subsequent execution sale were binding on the plaintiff as the widow sufficiently represented the estate of the deceased in the suit without fraud or collusion. The claim for interest was justified, the 1st defendant acted bona fide, and the decree against the widow was binding on the true legal representative. The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit, ruling in favor of the defendant and holding the plaintiff's next friend liable for costs. en-us Thu, 01 May 1930 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 19 Nov 2020 10:40:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291619 The court held that the decree in C.S. No. 81 of 1921 and the subsequent execution sale were binding on the plaintiff as the widow sufficiently represented the estate of the deceased in the suit without fraud or collusion. The claim for interest was justified, the 1st defendant acted bona fide, and the decree against the widow was binding on the true legal representative. The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit, ruling in favor of the defendant and holding the plaintiff's next friend liable for costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 01 May 1930 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291619