<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1935 (10) TMI 9 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291618</link>
    <description>An execution sale conducted after the death of the sole judgment-debtor is void if the decree-holder fails to proceed against the legal representative under Section 50 CPC and omits notice under Order 21 Rule 22. The notice is treated as part of the court&#039;s jurisdiction to proceed where no representative is already on record, so its absence is not a mere irregularity. Prior attachment does not cure the defect or dispense with impleading the legal representative, and the purchaser&#039;s bona fides cannot validate a sale made without jurisdiction. The sale was therefore liable to be set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Oct 1935 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2020 10:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=628031" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1935 (10) TMI 9 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291618</link>
      <description>An execution sale conducted after the death of the sole judgment-debtor is void if the decree-holder fails to proceed against the legal representative under Section 50 CPC and omits notice under Order 21 Rule 22. The notice is treated as part of the court&#039;s jurisdiction to proceed where no representative is already on record, so its absence is not a mere irregularity. Prior attachment does not cure the defect or dispense with impleading the legal representative, and the purchaser&#039;s bona fides cannot validate a sale made without jurisdiction. The sale was therefore liable to be set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Oct 1935 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291618</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>