<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 560 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400805</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the assessment order for the assessment year 2010-11, holding that it should have been made under section 153C instead of section 144 of the Income Tax Act. The appellant succeeded on the legal issue, leading to the appeal&#039;s allowance. The Tribunal did not deliberate on the merit-based grounds raised in the appeal, as they became academic.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2020 09:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=628020" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 560 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400805</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the assessment order for the assessment year 2010-11, holding that it should have been made under section 153C instead of section 144 of the Income Tax Act. The appellant succeeded on the legal issue, leading to the appeal&#039;s allowance. The Tribunal did not deliberate on the merit-based grounds raised in the appeal, as they became academic.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400805</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>