<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Third-Party Evidence Insufficient for Clandestine Removal Allegations Lacking Concrete Proof; Prevents Unfounded Cases.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=55553</link>
    <description>Clandestine Removal - If allegations can be made just on evidence obtained from third parties, there would be no dearth of such cases. We find that leaving alone proof with a mathematical precision, in the instant case, evidence made available is not even enough even for a Gross approximation. - the said allegation cannot be sustained on the basis of assumptions and conjectures. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2020 07:10:42 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2020 07:10:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=628003" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Third-Party Evidence Insufficient for Clandestine Removal Allegations Lacking Concrete Proof; Prevents Unfounded Cases.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=55553</link>
      <description>Clandestine Removal - If allegations can be made just on evidence obtained from third parties, there would be no dearth of such cases. We find that leaving alone proof with a mathematical precision, in the instant case, evidence made available is not even enough even for a Gross approximation. - the said allegation cannot be sustained on the basis of assumptions and conjectures. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2020 07:10:42 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=55553</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>