<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 547 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400792</link>
    <description>Refusal to register share transfers was found unsustainable where the original share certificates were alleged to be lost and the transferors had executed affidavits and indemnity bonds seeking duplicate certificates. The company relied mainly on non-enclosure of original certificates and on extraneous considerations connected with internal disputes, rather than on a bona fide legal basis. The register of members was treated as only prima facie evidence, and the company&#039;s power to refuse transfer under its articles had to be exercised for legitimate reasons. Registration of the share transfers and rectification of the register were therefore upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2021 14:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=627998" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 547 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400792</link>
      <description>Refusal to register share transfers was found unsustainable where the original share certificates were alleged to be lost and the transferors had executed affidavits and indemnity bonds seeking duplicate certificates. The company relied mainly on non-enclosure of original certificates and on extraneous considerations connected with internal disputes, rather than on a bona fide legal basis. The register of members was treated as only prima facie evidence, and the company&#039;s power to refuse transfer under its articles had to be exercised for legitimate reasons. Registration of the share transfers and rectification of the register were therefore upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400792</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>