<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 541 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400786</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application for rectification of mistake under Section 129B(2) of the Customs Act, 1962, upholding the original order that confirmed the demand of interest on the entire duty payable on imported goods. The Tribunal emphasized that findings of fact or law cannot be considered errors apparent on the record for rectification purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2020 18:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=627990" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 541 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400786</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application for rectification of mistake under Section 129B(2) of the Customs Act, 1962, upholding the original order that confirmed the demand of interest on the entire duty payable on imported goods. The Tribunal emphasized that findings of fact or law cannot be considered errors apparent on the record for rectification purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400786</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>