<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 538 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400783</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the service provided qualified as Works Contract Service and was not taxable for the period in question, which predated 01.06.2007. The tribunal set aside the order confirming the demand and penalties, allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2020 07:10:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=627986" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 538 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400783</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the service provided qualified as Works Contract Service and was not taxable for the period in question, which predated 01.06.2007. The tribunal set aside the order confirming the demand and penalties, allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400783</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>