https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291608 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal with consequential relief. It found the order inconsistent with legal precedents regarding the appellant's tax liability under the Finance Act, 1994, for procuring 'information technology software service.' The Tribunal relied on previous decisions affirming the discharge of liability through CENVAT credit and clarified that services procured from abroad were not taxable under CENVAT Credit Rules. The judgment emphasized adherence to established legal interpretations and highlighted the importance of consistency in tax liability matters. en-us Tue, 19 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Nov 2024 12:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291608 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal with consequential relief. It found the order inconsistent with legal precedents regarding the appellant's tax liability under the Finance Act, 1994, for procuring 'information technology software service.' The Tribunal relied on previous decisions affirming the discharge of liability through CENVAT credit and clarified that services procured from abroad were not taxable under CENVAT Credit Rules. The judgment emphasized adherence to established legal interpretations and highlighted the importance of consistency in tax liability matters. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 19 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291608