<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 1512 - ADDL. COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX (APPEALS)-CUM-APPELLATE AUTHORITY, PANCHKULA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291595</link>
    <description>A mere procedural lapse in e-way bill documentation, without evidence of intent to evade tax, does not justify detention-based tax and penalty under Section 129(3). Here, Part-B of the e-way bill was completed before the detention memo, and the record did not show mala fide conduct or conscious disregard of the statutory requirement, so the full tax-and-penalty demand was set aside. However, the incorrect particulars in the documents still amounted to a lesser contravention, and a nominal penalty for defective documentation was upheld under Section 125.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2025 17:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=627957" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 1512 - ADDL. COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX (APPEALS)-CUM-APPELLATE AUTHORITY, PANCHKULA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291595</link>
      <description>A mere procedural lapse in e-way bill documentation, without evidence of intent to evade tax, does not justify detention-based tax and penalty under Section 129(3). Here, Part-B of the e-way bill was completed before the detention memo, and the record did not show mala fide conduct or conscious disregard of the statutory requirement, so the full tax-and-penalty demand was set aside. However, the incorrect particulars in the documents still amounted to a lesser contravention, and a nominal penalty for defective documentation was upheld under Section 125.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291595</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>